On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:56:33 -0800 Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Yeah that's incorrect. But there were some failures to other patches > > due to a missing one I forgot to label stable. > > > > Anyway, I'm going to post 3 patches that should fix the problems > > (hopefully, I did run them through some of my tests). I'll send them as > > a reply to this email. > > Ok, I've queued these up for 3.10, and added the additional patch to > 3.13 and 3.12. If you want these in any other trees, please let me > know. Yeah, I'm working on a 3.4 queue of these patches. I have them done, but in the mean time I discovered another bug in 3.4 that has been fixed, but I'm having trouble finding what fixed it :-) I even performed a git reverse bisect, but there's a few bugs that were fixed along the way that cause my test to fail and it keeps bringing me to incorrect commits. When I get this solved, I'll be sending you a new update. Thanks, -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html