From: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@xxxxxxx>
commit e5a6ca27eb72c67533ddfc11c06df84beaa167fa upstream.
[Why]
If the payload_state is DP_PAYLOAD_DELETE_LOCAL in series, current
code doesn't delete the payload at current index and just move the
index to next one after shuffling payloads.
[How]
Drop the i++ increasing part in for loop head and decide whether
to increase the index or not according to payload_state of current
payload.
Changes since v1:
* Refine the code to have it easy reading
* Amend the commit message to meet the way code is modified now.
Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 706246c761dd ("drm/dp_mst: Refactor drm_dp_update_payload_part1()")
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Juston Li <juston.li@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v5.1+
[Added cc for stable]
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191203042423.5961-1-Wayne.Lin@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -2465,9 +2465,11 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct d
drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
}
- for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
- if (mgr->payloads[i].payload_state != DP_PAYLOAD_DELETE_LOCAL)
+ for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; /* do nothing */) {
+ if (mgr->payloads[i].payload_state != DP_PAYLOAD_DELETE_LOCAL) {
+ i++;
continue;
+ }
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("removing payload %d\n", i);
for (j = i; j < mgr->max_payloads - 1; j++) {
