Hi Johan, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 03:56:46PM +0900, Punit Agrawal wrote: >> Serdev sub-system claims all serial devices that are not already >> enumerated. As a result, no device node is created for serial port on >> certain boards such as the Apollo Lake based UP2. This has the >> unintended consequence of not being able to raise the login prompt via >> serial connection. >> >> Introduce a blacklist to reject devices that should not be treated as >> a serdev device. Add the Intel HS UART peripheral ids to the blacklist >> to bring back serial port on SoCs carrying them. >> >> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit1.agrawal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> >> Hi, >> >> The patch has been updated based on feedback recieved on the RFC[0]. >> >> Please consider merging if there are no objections. > > Rafael, I vaguely remember you arguing for a white list when we > discussed this at some conference. Do you have any objections to the > blacklist approach taken here? > >> [0] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-serial/msg36646.html >> >> drivers/tty/serdev/core.c | 10 ++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c b/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c >> index 226adeec2aed..0d64fb7d4f36 100644 >> --- a/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c >> +++ b/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c >> @@ -663,6 +663,12 @@ static acpi_status acpi_serdev_register_device(struct serdev_controller *ctrl, >> return AE_OK; >> } >> >> +static const struct acpi_device_id serdev_blacklist_devices[] = { >> + {"INT3511", 0}, >> + {"INT3512", 0}, > > Nit: Would you mind adding a space after { and before }? Sure - no problem. I'll include it in the next posting. Thanks for having a look. > >> + { }, >> +}; > > Johan
