On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 6:00 PM Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon Dec 16 19, Dan Williams wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 4:59 PM Jarkko Sakkinen
> ><jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 2019-12-11 at 16:54 -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> >> > Instead of repeatedly calling tpm_chip_start/tpm_chip_stop when
> >> > issuing commands to the tpm during initialization, just reserve the
> >> > chip after wait_startup, and release it when we are ready to call
> >> > tpm_chip_register.
> >> >
> >> > Cc: Christian Bundy <christianbundy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> > Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@xxxxxx>
> >> > Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
> >> > Cc: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > Cc: linux-integrity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > Fixes: a3fbfae82b4c ("tpm: take TPM chip power gating out of tpm_transmit()")
> >> > Fixes: 5b359c7c4372 ("tpm_tis_core: Turn on the TPM before probing IRQ's")
> >> > Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> I pushed to my master with minor tweaks and added my tags.
> >>
> >> Please check before I put it to linux-next.
> >
> >I don't see it yet here:
> >
> >http://git.infradead.org/users/jjs/linux-tpmdd.git/shortlog/refs/heads/master
> >
> >However, I wanted to make sure you captured that this does *not* fix
> >the interrupt issue. I.e. make sure you remove the "Fixes:
> >5b359c7c4372 ("tpm_tis_core: Turn on the TPM before probing IRQ's")"
> >tag.
> >
> >With that said, are you going to include the revert of:
> >
> >1ea32c83c699 tpm_tis_core: Set TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ before probing for interrupts
>
> Dan, with the above reverted do you still get the screaming interrupt?
Yes, the screaming interrupt goes away, although it is replaced by
these messages when the driver starts:
[ 3.725131] tpm_tis IFX0740:00: 2.0 TPM (device-id 0x1B, rev-id 16)
[ 3.725358] tpm tpm0: tpm_try_transmit: send(): error -5
[ 3.725359] tpm tpm0: [Firmware Bug]: TPM interrupt not working,
polling instead
If the choice is "error message + polled-mode" vs "pinning a cpu with
interrupts" I'd accept the former, but wanted Jarkko with his
maintainer hat to weigh in.
Is there a simple sanity check I can run to see if the TPM is still
operational in this state?
