From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit e2ac579a7a18bcd9e8cf14cf42eac0b8a2ba6c4b ] We need to initialize the frame pointer register not just if it is seen as a source operand, but also if it is seen as the destination operand of a store or an atomic instruction (which effectively is a source operand). This is exercised by test_verifier's "non-invalid fp arithmetic" Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c b/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c index adfb4581bd809..dfb1a62abe932 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c +++ b/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c @@ -1326,6 +1326,9 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx) const u8 tmp2 = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_2]; u32 opcode = 0, rs2; + if (insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_FP) + ctx->saw_frame_pointer = true; + ctx->tmp_2_used = true; emit_loadimm(imm, tmp2, ctx); @@ -1364,6 +1367,9 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx) const u8 tmp = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_1]; u32 opcode = 0, rs2; + if (insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_FP) + ctx->saw_frame_pointer = true; + switch (BPF_SIZE(code)) { case BPF_W: opcode = ST32; @@ -1396,6 +1402,9 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx) const u8 tmp2 = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_2]; const u8 tmp3 = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_3]; + if (insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_FP) + ctx->saw_frame_pointer = true; + ctx->tmp_1_used = true; ctx->tmp_2_used = true; ctx->tmp_3_used = true; @@ -1416,6 +1425,9 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx) const u8 tmp2 = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_2]; const u8 tmp3 = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_3]; + if (insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_FP) + ctx->saw_frame_pointer = true; + ctx->tmp_1_used = true; ctx->tmp_2_used = true; ctx->tmp_3_used = true; -- 2.20.1