From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
commit 04f11ef45810da5ae2542dd78cc353f3761bd2cb upstream.
Write the desired L2 CR3 into vmcs02.GUEST_CR3 during nested VM-Enter
instead of deferring the VMWRITE until vmx_set_cr3(). If the VMWRITE
is deferred, then KVM can consume a stale vmcs02.GUEST_CR3 when it
refreshes vmcs12->guest_cr3 during nested_vmx_vmexit() if the emulated
VM-Exit occurs without actually entering L2, e.g. if the nested run
is squashed because nested VM-Enter (from L1) is putting L2 into HLT.
Note, the above scenario can occur regardless of whether L1 is
intercepting HLT, e.g. L1 can intercept HLT and then re-enter L2 with
vmcs.GUEST_ACTIVITY_STATE=HALTED. But practically speaking, a VMM will
likely put a guest into HALTED if and only if it's not intercepting HLT.
In an ideal world where EPT *requires* unrestricted guest (and vice
versa), VMX could handle CR3 similar to how it handles RSP and RIP,
e.g. mark CR3 dirty and conditionally load it at vmx_vcpu_run(). But
the unrestricted guest silliness complicates the dirty tracking logic
to the point that explicitly handling vmcs02.GUEST_CR3 during nested
VM-Enter is a simpler overall implementation.
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reported-and-tested-by: Reto Buerki <reet@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Liran Alon <liran.alon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 10 ++++++++++
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 10 +++++++---
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -2392,6 +2392,16 @@ static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcp
entry_failure_code))
return -EINVAL;
+ /*
+ * Immediately write vmcs02.GUEST_CR3. It will be propagated to vmcs12
+ * on nested VM-Exit, which can occur without actually running L2 and
+ * thus without hitting vmx_set_cr3(), e.g. if L1 is entering L2 with
+ * vmcs12.GUEST_ACTIVITYSTATE=HLT, in which case KVM will intercept the
+ * transition to HLT instead of running L2.
+ */
+ if (enable_ept)
+ vmcs_writel(GUEST_CR3, vmcs12->guest_cr3);
+
/* Late preparation of GUEST_PDPTRs now that EFER and CRs are set. */
if (load_guest_pdptrs_vmcs12 && nested_cpu_has_ept(vmcs12) &&
is_pae_paging(vcpu)) {
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -2878,6 +2878,7 @@ u64 construct_eptp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu
void vmx_set_cr3(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr3)
{
struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
+ bool update_guest_cr3 = true;
unsigned long guest_cr3;
u64 eptp;
@@ -2894,15 +2895,18 @@ void vmx_set_cr3(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
spin_unlock(&to_kvm_vmx(kvm)->ept_pointer_lock);
}
- if (enable_unrestricted_guest || is_paging(vcpu) ||
- is_guest_mode(vcpu))
+ /* Loading vmcs02.GUEST_CR3 is handled by nested VM-Enter. */
+ if (is_guest_mode(vcpu))
+ update_guest_cr3 = false;
+ else if (enable_unrestricted_guest || is_paging(vcpu))
guest_cr3 = kvm_read_cr3(vcpu);
else
guest_cr3 = to_kvm_vmx(kvm)->ept_identity_map_addr;
ept_load_pdptrs(vcpu);
}
- vmcs_writel(GUEST_CR3, guest_cr3);
+ if (update_guest_cr3)
+ vmcs_writel(GUEST_CR3, guest_cr3);
}
int vmx_set_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4)
