Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
I'll go ahead and push this to drm-misc-next-fixes right now, thanks!
On Thu, 2019-12-05 at 17:00 +0800, Wayne Lin wrote:
> [Why]
>
> This patch is trying to address the issue observed when hotplug DP
> daisy chain monitors.
>
> e.g.
> src-mstb-mstb-sst -> src (unplug) mstb-mstb-sst -> src-mstb-mstb-sst
> (plug in again)
>
> Once unplug a DP MST capable device, driver will call
> drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst() to disable MST. In this function,
> it cleans data of topology manager while disabling mst_state. However,
> it doesn't clean up the proposed_vcpis of topology manager.
> If proposed_vcpi is not reset, once plug in MST daisy chain monitors
> later, code will fail at checking port validation while trying to
> allocate payloads.
>
> When MST capable device is plugged in again and try to allocate
> payloads by calling drm_dp_update_payload_part1(), this
> function will iterate over all proposed virtual channels to see if
> any proposed VCPI's num_slots is greater than 0. If any proposed
> VCPI's num_slots is greater than 0 and the port which the
> specific virtual channel directed to is not in the topology, code then
> fails at the port validation. Since there are stale VCPI allocations
> from the previous topology enablement in proposed_vcpi[], code will fail
> at port validation and reurn EINVAL.
>
> [How]
>
> Clean up the data of stale proposed_vcpi[] and reset mgr->proposed_vcpis
> to NULL while disabling mst in drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst().
>
> Changes since v1:
> *Add on more details in commit message to describe the issue which the
> patch is trying to fix
>
> Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> index ae5809a1f19a..bf4f745a4edb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> @@ -3386,6 +3386,7 @@ static int drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw(u8 dp_link_bw,
> u8 dp_link_count)
> int drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> bool mst_state)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> + int i = 0;
> struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb = NULL;
>
> mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
> @@ -3446,10 +3447,21 @@ int drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(struct
> drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, bool ms
> /* this can fail if the device is gone */
> drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(mgr->aux, DP_MSTM_CTRL, 0);
> ret = 0;
> + mutex_lock(&mgr->payload_lock);
> memset(mgr->payloads, 0, mgr->max_payloads * sizeof(struct
> drm_dp_payload));
> mgr->payload_mask = 0;
> set_bit(0, &mgr->payload_mask);
> + for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
> + struct drm_dp_vcpi *vcpi = mgr->proposed_vcpis[i];
> +
> + if (vcpi) {
> + vcpi->vcpi = 0;
> + vcpi->num_slots = 0;
> + }
> + mgr->proposed_vcpis[i] = NULL;
> + }
> mgr->vcpi_mask = 0;
> + mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock);
> }
>
> out_unlock:
--
Cheers,
Lyude Paul
