From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 50c2936634bcb1db78a8ca63249236810c11a80f ]
Digging through the ioctls with Al because of the previous
patches, we found that on 64-bit decnet's dn_dev_ioctl()
is wrong, because struct ifreq::ifr_ifru is actually 24
bytes (not 16 as expected from struct sockaddr) due to the
ifru_map and ifru_settings members.
Clearly, decnet expects the ioctl to be called with a struct
like
struct ifreq_dn {
char ifr_name[IFNAMSIZ];
struct sockaddr_dn ifr_addr;
};
since it does
struct ifreq *ifr = ...;
struct sockaddr_dn *sdn = (struct sockaddr_dn *)&ifr->ifr_addr;
This means that DN_IFREQ_SIZE is too big for what it wants on
64-bit, as it is
sizeof(struct ifreq) - sizeof(struct sockaddr) +
sizeof(struct sockaddr_dn)
This assumes that sizeof(struct sockaddr) is the size of ifr_ifru
but that isn't true.
Fix this to use offsetof(struct ifreq, ifr_ifru).
This indeed doesn't really matter much - the result is that we
copy in/out 8 bytes more than we should on 64-bit platforms. In
case the "struct ifreq_dn" lands just on the end of a page though
it might lead to faults.
As far as I can tell, it has been like this forever, so it seems
very likely that nobody cares.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/decnet/dn_dev.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/decnet/dn_dev.c b/net/decnet/dn_dev.c
index b2c26b081134a..80554e7e9a0f6 100644
--- a/net/decnet/dn_dev.c
+++ b/net/decnet/dn_dev.c
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
#include <net/dn_neigh.h>
#include <net/dn_fib.h>
-#define DN_IFREQ_SIZE (sizeof(struct ifreq) - sizeof(struct sockaddr) + sizeof(struct sockaddr_dn))
+#define DN_IFREQ_SIZE (offsetof(struct ifreq, ifr_ifru) + sizeof(struct sockaddr_dn))
static char dn_rt_all_end_mcast[ETH_ALEN] = {0xAB,0x00,0x00,0x04,0x00,0x00};
static char dn_rt_all_rt_mcast[ETH_ALEN] = {0xAB,0x00,0x00,0x03,0x00,0x00};
--
2.20.1
