Re: [4.19.y PATCH] tmpfs: fix unable to remount nr_inodes from limited to unlimited

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 09:11:37PM +0800, yu kuai wrote:
> tmpfs support 'size', 'nr_blocks' and 'nr_inodes' mount options. mount or
> remount them to zero means unlimited. 'size' and 'br_blocks' can remount
> from limited to unlimited, while 'nr_inodes' can't.
> 
> The problem is fixed since upstream commit 0b5071dd323d ("
> shmem_parse_options(): use a separate structure to keep the results"). But
> in order to backport it, the amount of related patches need to backport is
> huge. 
> 
> So, I made some local changes to fix the problem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: yu kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/shmem.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index 3c8742655756..966fc69ee8fb 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -3444,7 +3444,7 @@ static int shmem_remount_fs(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
>  	inodes = sbinfo->max_inodes - sbinfo->free_inodes;
>  	if (percpu_counter_compare(&sbinfo->used_blocks, config.max_blocks) > 0)
>  		goto out;
> -	if (config.max_inodes < inodes)
> +	if (config.max_inodes && config.max_inodes < inodes)
>  		goto out;
>  	/*
>  	 * Those tests disallow limited->unlimited while any are in use;
> @@ -3460,7 +3460,10 @@ static int shmem_remount_fs(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
>  	sbinfo->huge = config.huge;
>  	sbinfo->max_blocks  = config.max_blocks;
>  	sbinfo->max_inodes  = config.max_inodes;
> -	sbinfo->free_inodes = config.max_inodes - inodes;
> +	if (!config.max_inodes)
> +		sbinfo->free_inodes = 0;
> +	else
> +		sbinfo->free_inodes = config.max_inodes - inodes;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Preserve previous mempolicy unless mpol remount option was specified.
> -- 
> 2.17.2
> 

Hm, sorry about my bot, this looked like an odd one-off patch.

What about 5.3.y, should this patch also go there as well?

But is it really an issue as this is a new "feature" that 5.4 now has,
can't you just use 5.4.y if you need this type of thing?  It's never
worked in the past, right?

thanks,

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux