From: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 01929a65dfa13e18d89264ab1378854a91857e59 ]
Currently the SMP PHY control execution result is checked, however the
function result for the command is not.
As such, we may be missing all potential errors, like SMP FUNCTION FAILED,
INVALID REQUEST FRAME LENGTH, etc., meaning the PHY control request has
failed.
In some scenarios we need to ensure the function result is accepted, so add
a check for this.
Tested-by: Jian Luo <luojian5@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
index f9d4a24c14b5a..3e74fe9257617 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
@@ -614,7 +614,14 @@ int sas_smp_phy_control(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id,
}
res = smp_execute_task(dev, pc_req, PC_REQ_SIZE, pc_resp,PC_RESP_SIZE);
-
+ if (res) {
+ pr_err("ex %016llx phy%02d PHY control failed: %d\n",
+ SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr), phy_id, res);
+ } else if (pc_resp[2] != SMP_RESP_FUNC_ACC) {
+ pr_err("ex %016llx phy%02d PHY control failed: function result 0x%x\n",
+ SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr), phy_id, pc_resp[2]);
+ res = pc_resp[2];
+ }
kfree(pc_resp);
kfree(pc_req);
return res;
--
2.20.1
