[PATCH 4.19 235/321] net: fix possible overflow in __sk_mem_raise_allocated()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 5bf325a53202b8728cf7013b72688c46071e212e ]

With many active TCP sockets, fat TCP sockets could fool
__sk_mem_raise_allocated() thanks to an overflow.

They would increase their share of the memory, instead
of decreasing it.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/net/sock.h | 2 +-
 net/core/sock.c    | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 0252c0d003104..4545a9ecc2193 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -1272,7 +1272,7 @@ static inline void sk_sockets_allocated_inc(struct sock *sk)
 	percpu_counter_inc(sk->sk_prot->sockets_allocated);
 }
 
-static inline int
+static inline u64
 sk_sockets_allocated_read_positive(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	return percpu_counter_read_positive(sk->sk_prot->sockets_allocated);
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index ba4f843cdd1d1..bbde5f6a7dc91 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -2435,7 +2435,7 @@ int __sk_mem_raise_allocated(struct sock *sk, int size, int amt, int kind)
 	}
 
 	if (sk_has_memory_pressure(sk)) {
-		int alloc;
+		u64 alloc;
 
 		if (!sk_under_memory_pressure(sk))
 			return 1;
-- 
2.20.1






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux