snip
> >
> > Should we simply revert the patch, maybe also
> > 9fe573d539a8 ("KVM: nVMX: reset cache/shadows when switching loaded VMCS")
> >
> > Both of them are from one big patchset:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10616179/
> >
> > Revert both patches recover the regression I see on kvm-unit-tests.
>
> Greg already included the patches that the bot missed, so it's okay.
>
> Paolo
>
Sorry, I think I gave wrong information initially, it's 9fe573d539a8
("KVM: nVMX: reset cache/shadows when switching loaded VMCS")
which caused regression.
Should we revert or there's following up fix we should backport?
Thanks,
Jack
