This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
mm: ignore VM_SOFTDIRTY on VMA merging
to the 3.13-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
mm-ignore-vm_softdirty-on-vma-merging.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.13 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From 34228d473efe764d4db7c0536375f0c993e6e06a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:53:42 -0800
Subject: mm: ignore VM_SOFTDIRTY on VMA merging
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
commit 34228d473efe764d4db7c0536375f0c993e6e06a upstream.
The VM_SOFTDIRTY bit affects vma merge routine: if two VMAs has all bits
in vm_flags matched except dirty bit the kernel can't longer merge them
and this forces the kernel to generate new VMAs instead.
It finally may lead to the situation when userspace application reaches
vm.max_map_count limit and get crashed in worse case
| (gimp:11768): GLib-ERROR **: gmem.c:110: failed to allocate 4096 bytes
|
| (file-tiff-load:12038): LibGimpBase-WARNING **: file-tiff-load: gimp_wire_read(): error
| xinit: connection to X server lost
|
| waiting for X server to shut down
| /usr/lib64/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/file-tiff-load terminated: Hangup
| /usr/lib64/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/script-fu terminated: Hangup
| /usr/lib64/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/script-fu terminated: Hangup
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67651
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719619#c0
Initial problem came from missed VM_SOFTDIRTY in do_brk() routine but
even if we would set up VM_SOFTDIRTY here, there is still a way to
prevent VMAs from merging: one can call
| echo 4 > /proc/$PID/clear_refs
and clear all VM_SOFTDIRTY over all VMAs presented in memory map, then
new do_brk() will try to extend old VMA and finds that dirty bit doesn't
match thus new VMA will be generated.
As discussed with Pavel, the right approach should be to ignore
VM_SOFTDIRTY bit when we're trying to merge VMAs and if merge successed
we mark extended VMA with dirty bit where needed.
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Bastian Hougaard <gnome@xxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/mmap.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -893,7 +893,15 @@ again: remove_next = 1 + (end > next->
static inline int is_mergeable_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
struct file *file, unsigned long vm_flags)
{
- if (vma->vm_flags ^ vm_flags)
+ /*
+ * VM_SOFTDIRTY should not prevent from VMA merging, if we
+ * match the flags but dirty bit -- the caller should mark
+ * merged VMA as dirty. If dirty bit won't be excluded from
+ * comparison, we increase pressue on the memory system forcing
+ * the kernel to generate new VMAs when old one could be
+ * extended instead.
+ */
+ if ((vma->vm_flags ^ vm_flags) & ~VM_SOFTDIRTY)
return 0;
if (vma->vm_file != file)
return 0;
@@ -1082,7 +1090,7 @@ static int anon_vma_compatible(struct vm
return a->vm_end == b->vm_start &&
mpol_equal(vma_policy(a), vma_policy(b)) &&
a->vm_file == b->vm_file &&
- !((a->vm_flags ^ b->vm_flags) & ~(VM_READ|VM_WRITE|VM_EXEC)) &&
+ !((a->vm_flags ^ b->vm_flags) & ~(VM_READ|VM_WRITE|VM_EXEC|VM_SOFTDIRTY)) &&
b->vm_pgoff == a->vm_pgoff + ((b->vm_start - a->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx are
queue-3.13/mm-ignore-vm_softdirty-on-vma-merging.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html