[PATCH 4.19 037/220] arm64/numa: Report correct memblock range for the dummy node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 77cfe950901e5c13aca2df6437a05f39dd9a929b ]

The dummy node ID is marked into all memory ranges on the system. So the
dummy node really extends the entire memblock.memory. Hence report correct
extent information for the dummy node using memblock range helper functions
instead of the range [0LLU, PFN_PHYS(max_pfn) - 1)].

Fixes: 1a2db30034 ("arm64, numa: Add NUMA support for arm64 platforms")
Acked-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
index 146c04ceaa514..54529b4ed5130 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
@@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
 	if (numa_off)
 		pr_info("NUMA disabled\n"); /* Forced off on command line. */
 	pr_info("Faking a node at [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n",
-		0LLU, PFN_PHYS(max_pfn) - 1);
+		memblock_start_of_DRAM(), memblock_end_of_DRAM() - 1);
 
 	for_each_memblock(memory, mblk) {
 		ret = numa_add_memblk(0, mblk->base, mblk->base + mblk->size);
-- 
2.20.1






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux