From: Darren Hart <dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-------------------
This is a commit scheduled for the next v2.6.34 longterm release.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/paulg/longterm-queue-2.6.34.git
If you see a problem with using this for longterm, please comment.
-------------------
commit f27071cb7fe3e1d37a9dbe6c0dfc5395cd40fa43 upstream.
The WARN_ON in futex_wait_requeue_pi() for a NULL q.pi_state was testing
the address (&q.pi_state) of the pointer instead of the value
(q.pi_state) of the pointer. Correct it accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1c85d97f6e5f79ec389a4ead3e367363c74bd09a.1342809673.git.dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/futex.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index 4a8f72850152..d4e7f0ea1f94 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -2321,7 +2321,7 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared,
* signal. futex_unlock_pi() will not destroy the lock_ptr nor
* the pi_state.
*/
- WARN_ON(!&q.pi_state);
+ WARN_ON(!q.pi_state);
pi_mutex = &q.pi_state->pi_mutex;
ret = rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter, 1);
debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&rt_waiter);
--
1.8.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html