From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 722ddfde366fd46205456a9c5ff9b3359dc9a75e upstream.
The final sort might get confused when the comparison is done over
bigger numbers than int like for -s time.
Check the following report for longer workloads:
$ perf report -s time -F time,overhead --stdio
Fix hist_entry__sort() to properly return int64_t and not possible cut
int.
Fixes: 043ca389a318 ("perf tools: Use hpp formats to sort final output")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v3.16+
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191104232711.16055-1-jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/util/hist.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/tools/perf/util/hist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
@@ -1618,7 +1618,7 @@ int hists__collapse_resort(struct hists
return 0;
}
-static int hist_entry__sort(struct hist_entry *a, struct hist_entry *b)
+static int64_t hist_entry__sort(struct hist_entry *a, struct hist_entry *b)
{
struct hists *hists = a->hists;
struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt;
