On Thu 2019-11-07 16:43:17, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 21:18 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 07:59:32PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > [...] > > > I'm confused. You said "by Tue ... 08:27:02 PM UTC". That 8 PM is 20h, > > > but did the release on 10h GMT+1, or 9h UTC -- 9 AM.... so like 11 > > > hours early, if I got the timezones right. > > > > > > Does PM mean something else in the above context? > > > > Ugh, no, you are right, I was ignoring the PM thing, I thought the -u > > option to date would give me a 24 hour date string, and so I thought > > that was 8:27 in the morning. > > > > Let me mess around with 'date' to see if I can come up with a better > > string to use here. I guess: > > date --rfc-3339=seconds -u > > would probably be best? > > The --rfc-822 option should give you something close to the current > format, but with 24-hour numbering. pavel@amd:~$ date --rfc-822 Fri, 08 Nov 2019 22:30:14 +0100 I like that more, as that is closer to format normally used in the emails: On Thu 2019-11-07 16:43:17, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 21:18 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 07:59:32PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: Thanks and best regards, Pavel -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
