From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 301428ea3708188dc4a243e6e6b46c03b46a0fbc ]
If a nonblocking socket is immediately closed after connect(),
the connect worker may not have started. This results in a refcount
problem, since sock_hold() is called from the connect worker.
This patch moves the sock_hold in front of the connect worker
scheduling.
Reported-by: syzbot+4c063e6dea39e4b79f29@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 50717a37db03 ("net/smc: nonblocking connect rework")
Reviewed-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/smc/af_smc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -707,8 +707,6 @@ static int __smc_connect(struct smc_sock
int smc_type;
int rc = 0;
- sock_hold(&smc->sk); /* sock put in passive closing */
-
if (smc->use_fallback)
return smc_connect_fallback(smc, smc->fallback_rsn);
@@ -853,6 +851,8 @@ static int smc_connect(struct socket *so
rc = kernel_connect(smc->clcsock, addr, alen, flags);
if (rc && rc != -EINPROGRESS)
goto out;
+
+ sock_hold(&smc->sk); /* sock put in passive closing */
if (flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
if (schedule_work(&smc->connect_work))
smc->connect_nonblock = 1;
