From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 3d1e5039f5f87a8731202ceca08764ee7cb010d3 ]
For some reason I missed the case of DCCP passive
flows in my previous patch.
Fixes: a904a0693c18 ("inet: stop leaking jiffies on the wire")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Thiemo Nagel <tnagel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/dccp/ipv4.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/dccp/ipv4.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ struct sock *dccp_v4_request_recv_sock(c
RCU_INIT_POINTER(newinet->inet_opt, rcu_dereference(ireq->ireq_opt));
newinet->mc_index = inet_iif(skb);
newinet->mc_ttl = ip_hdr(skb)->ttl;
- newinet->inet_id = jiffies;
+ newinet->inet_id = prandom_u32();
if (dst == NULL && (dst = inet_csk_route_child_sock(sk, newsk, req)) == NULL)
goto put_and_exit;
