Re: io_uring stable 5.3 backports

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/27/19 8:24 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 08:03:09AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 10/27/19 7:48 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 06:01:03AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> On 10/27/19 2:52 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 05:33:41PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For some reason I forgot to mark these stable, but they should go
>>>>>> into stable. In order of applying them, they are:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> bc808bced39f4e4b626c5ea8c63d5e41fce7205a
>>>>>
>>>>> This commit says it fixes c576666863b78 ("io_uring: optimize
>>>>> submit_and_wait API") which is not in the stable tree.
>>>>>
>>>>>> ef03681ae8df770745978148a7fb84796ae99cba
>>>>>
>>>>> This commit doesn't say so, but really it fixes 5262f567987d3
>>>>> ("io_uring: IORING_OP_TIMEOUT support") which is not in the stable tree.
>>>>>
>>>>>> a1f58ba46f794b1168d1107befcf3d4b9f9fd453
>>>>>
>>>>> Same as the commit above.
>>>>
>>>> Oh man, sorry about that, I always forget to check if all of them are in
>>>> 5.3. I blame the fact that I backport everything to our internal tree,
>>>> which is 5.2 based. But yes, you are of course right, those three can be
>>>> dropped.
>>>
>>> How much "secret sauce" does your internal tree have? Is it something
>>> we can peek into to make sure we don't miss fixes?
>>
>> There's no secret sauce in the internal tree, it's just that I backport
>> everything into the 5.2 version that is our newest. It's fully uptodate
>> with 5.4-rc and in some cases what's queued up for 5.5 as well. Hence I
>> sometimes forget to check what is applicable to 5.3-stable, since I have
>> it in our 5.2 tree...
>>
>> The internal tree is just backports. That's how we do things.
> 
> Could you push it somewhere public? I could automate grabbing fixes off
> of it.

There a few reasons why that hasn't been done, and none of them are
related to the actual code/patches in there..

But I don't think it would help you. The io_uring branch is a mix of
things that have gone into the current window (and may or may not need
to go to stable), and things that are queued up for the next kernel
versions (and aren't going to stable). This will just continue to drift
from stable, until we respin a new kernel version internally.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux