This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
s390/bpf,jit: fix 32 bit divisions, use unsigned divide instructions
to the 3.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
s390-bpf-jit-fix-32-bit-divisions-use-unsigned-divide-instructions.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From foo@baz Tue Feb 4 09:07:36 PST 2014
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:37:15 +0100
Subject: s390/bpf,jit: fix 32 bit divisions, use unsigned divide instructions
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 3af57f78c38131b7a66e2b01e06fdacae01992a3 ]
The s390 bpf jit compiler emits the signed divide instructions "dr" and "d"
for unsigned divisions.
This can cause problems: the dividend will be zero extended to a 64 bit value
and the divisor is the 32 bit signed value as specified A or X accumulator,
even though A and X are supposed to be treated as unsigned values.
The divide instrunctions will generate an exception if the result cannot be
expressed with a 32 bit signed value.
This is the case if e.g. the dividend is 0xffffffff and the divisor either 1
or also 0xffffffff (signed: -1).
To avoid all these issues simply use unsigned divide instructions.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -335,16 +335,16 @@ static int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *
EMIT4_PCREL(0xa7840000, (jit->ret0_ip - jit->prg));
/* lhi %r4,0 */
EMIT4(0xa7480000);
- /* dr %r4,%r12 */
- EMIT2(0x1d4c);
+ /* dlr %r4,%r12 */
+ EMIT4(0xb997004c);
break;
case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K: /* A /= K */
if (K == 1)
break;
/* lhi %r4,0 */
EMIT4(0xa7480000);
- /* d %r4,<d(K)>(%r13) */
- EMIT4_DISP(0x5d40d000, EMIT_CONST(K));
+ /* dl %r4,<d(K)>(%r13) */
+ EMIT6_DISP(0xe340d000, 0x0097, EMIT_CONST(K));
break;
case BPF_S_ALU_MOD_X: /* A %= X */
jit->seen |= SEEN_XREG | SEEN_RET0;
@@ -354,8 +354,8 @@ static int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *
EMIT4_PCREL(0xa7840000, (jit->ret0_ip - jit->prg));
/* lhi %r4,0 */
EMIT4(0xa7480000);
- /* dr %r4,%r12 */
- EMIT2(0x1d4c);
+ /* dlr %r4,%r12 */
+ EMIT4(0xb997004c);
/* lr %r5,%r4 */
EMIT2(0x1854);
break;
@@ -367,8 +367,8 @@ static int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *
}
/* lhi %r4,0 */
EMIT4(0xa7480000);
- /* d %r4,<d(K)>(%r13) */
- EMIT4_DISP(0x5d40d000, EMIT_CONST(K));
+ /* dl %r4,<d(K)>(%r13) */
+ EMIT6_DISP(0xe340d000, 0x0097, EMIT_CONST(K));
/* lr %r5,%r4 */
EMIT2(0x1854);
break;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx are
queue-3.10/s390-uapi-fix-struct-statfs64-definition.patch
queue-3.10/bpf-do-not-use-reciprocal-divide.patch
queue-3.10/kvm-s390-fix-diagnose-code-extraction.patch
queue-3.10/s390-bpf-jit-fix-32-bit-divisions-use-unsigned-divide-instructions.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html