On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 at 14:16, Quentin Perret <qperret@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Valentin,
>
> On Monday 14 Oct 2019 at 12:47:10 (+0100), Valentin Schneider wrote:
> > While the static key is correctly initialized as being disabled, it will
> > remain forever enabled once turned on. This means that if we start with an
> > asymmetric system and hotplug out enough CPUs to end up with an SMP system,
> > the static key will remain set - which is obviously wrong. We should detect
> > this and turn off things like misfit migration and EAS wakeups.
>
> FWIW we already clear the EAS static key properly (based on the sd
> pointer, not the static key), so this is really only for the
> capacity-aware stuff.
>
> > Having that key enabled should also mandate
> >
> > per_cpu(sd_asym_cpucapacity, cpu) != NULL
> >
> > for all CPUs, but this is obviously not true with the above.
> >
> > On top of that, sched domain rebuilds first lead to attaching the NULL
> > domain to the affected CPUs, which means there will be a window where the
> > static key is set but the sd_asym_cpucapacity shortcut points to NULL even
> > if asymmetry hasn't been hotplugged out.
> >
> > Disable the static key when destroying domains, and let
> > build_sched_domains() (re) enable it as needed.
> >
> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Fixes: df054e8445a4 ("sched/topology: Add static_key for asymmetric CPU capacity optimizations")
> > Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/topology.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> > index b5667a273bf6..c49ae57a0611 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> > @@ -2123,7 +2123,8 @@ static void detach_destroy_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
> > {
> > int i;
> >
> > + static_branch_disable_cpuslocked(&sched_asym_cpucapacity);
> > +
> > rcu_read_lock();
> > for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map)
> > cpu_attach_domain(NULL, &def_root_domain, i);
>
> So what happens it you have mutiple root domains ? You might skip
> build_sched_domains() for one of them and end up not setting the static
> key when you should no ?
good point
>
> I suppose an alternative would be to play with static_branch_inc() /
> static_branch_dec() from build_sched_domains() or something along those
> lines.
>
> Thanks,
> Quentin
