Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] riscv: Avoid interrupts being erroneously enabled in" failed to apply to 5.3-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] riscv: Avoid interrupts being erroneously enabled in" failed to apply to 5.3-stable tree
From: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 18:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, vincent.chen@xxxxxxxxxx, david.abdurachmanov@xxxxxxxxxx, palmer@xxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20191009005252.GQ1396@sasha-vm>
User-agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (DEB 301 2018-08-15)

On Tue, 8 Oct 2019, Sasha Levin wrote:

> I might be missing something here, but wasn't the label "1" already
> declared a few lines above?

See the "Local Labels" section of 

https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.24/as/Symbol-Names.html#Symbol-Names


- Paul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] riscv: Avoid interrupts being erroneously enabled in" failed to apply to 5.3-stable tree
  - From: Sasha Levin

References:
- FAILED: patch "[PATCH] riscv: Avoid interrupts being erroneously enabled in" failed to apply to 5.3-stable tree
  - From: gregkh
- Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] riscv: Avoid interrupts being erroneously enabled in" failed to apply to 5.3-stable tree
  - From: Sasha Levin

Prev by Date: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] riscv: Avoid interrupts being erroneously enabled in" failed to apply to 5.3-stable tree
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] rpmsg: glink: Don't send pending rx_done during remove
Previous by thread: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] riscv: Avoid interrupts being erroneously enabled in" failed to apply to 5.3-stable tree
Next by thread: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] riscv: Avoid interrupts being erroneously enabled in" failed to apply to 5.3-stable tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]