Re: [PATCH] xen/xenbus: fix self-deadlock after killing user process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 01:37:24PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 10/1/19 11:03 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > In case a user process using xenbus has open transactions and is killed
> > e.g. via ctrl-C the following cleanup of the allocated resources might
> > result in a deadlock due to trying to end a transaction in the xenbus
> > worker thread:
> >
> > [ 2551.474706] INFO: task xenbus:37 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> > [ 2551.492215]       Tainted: P           OE     5.0.0-29-generic #5
> > [ 2551.510263] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> > [ 2551.528585] xenbus          D    0    37      2 0x80000080
> > [ 2551.528590] Call Trace:
> > [ 2551.528603]  __schedule+0x2c0/0x870
> > [ 2551.528606]  ? _cond_resched+0x19/0x40
> > [ 2551.528632]  schedule+0x2c/0x70
> > [ 2551.528637]  xs_talkv+0x1ec/0x2b0
> > [ 2551.528642]  ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80
> > [ 2551.528645]  xs_single+0x53/0x80
> > [ 2551.528648]  xenbus_transaction_end+0x3b/0x70
> > [ 2551.528651]  xenbus_file_free+0x5a/0x160
> > [ 2551.528654]  xenbus_dev_queue_reply+0xc4/0x220
> > [ 2551.528657]  xenbus_thread+0x7de/0x880
> > [ 2551.528660]  ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80
> > [ 2551.528665]  kthread+0x121/0x140
> > [ 2551.528667]  ? xb_read+0x1d0/0x1d0
> > [ 2551.528670]  ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
> > [ 2551.528673]  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> >
> > Fix this by doing the cleanup via a workqueue instead.
> >
> > Reported-by: James Dingwall <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Fixes: fd8aa9095a95c ("xen: optimize xenbus driver for multiple concurrent xenstore accesses")
> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.11
> > Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 

Tested-by: James Dingwall <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

This patch does resolve the observed issue although for my (extreme and 
not representative of our normal workload) test case the worker still 
gets blocked for some time if the xenstore-rm is interrupted and no 
concurrent xenstore commands can run.  I assume that the worker 
completes the rm and then does a rollback in the background rather than 
being interrupted early as a result of the userspace program being 
terminated.

Thanks,
James



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux