From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 59d06cea1198d665ba11f7e8c5f45b00ff2e4812 ] If a task happens to be throttled while the CPU it was running on gets hotplugged off, the bandwidth associated with the task is not correctly migrated with it when the replenishment timer fires (offline_migration). Fix things up, for this_bw, running_bw and total_bw, when replenishment timer fires and task is migrated (dl_task_offline_migration()). Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: bristot@xxxxxxxxxx Cc: claudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx Cc: longman@xxxxxxxxxx Cc: luca.abeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx Cc: rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx Cc: tj@xxxxxxxxxx Cc: tommaso.cucinotta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190719140000.31694-5-juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/sched/deadline.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c index 1c66480afda81..fcdafdcb129cc 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c @@ -529,6 +529,7 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_later_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq); static struct rq *dl_task_offline_migration(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) { struct rq *later_rq = NULL; + struct dl_bw *dl_b; later_rq = find_lock_later_rq(p, rq); if (!later_rq) { @@ -557,6 +558,38 @@ static struct rq *dl_task_offline_migration(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p double_lock_balance(rq, later_rq); } + if (p->dl.dl_non_contending || p->dl.dl_throttled) { + /* + * Inactive timer is armed (or callback is running, but + * waiting for us to release rq locks). In any case, when it + * will fire (or continue), it will see running_bw of this + * task migrated to later_rq (and correctly handle it). + */ + sub_running_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl); + sub_rq_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl); + + add_rq_bw(&p->dl, &later_rq->dl); + add_running_bw(&p->dl, &later_rq->dl); + } else { + sub_rq_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl); + add_rq_bw(&p->dl, &later_rq->dl); + } + + /* + * And we finally need to fixup root_domain(s) bandwidth accounting, + * since p is still hanging out in the old (now moved to default) root + * domain. + */ + dl_b = &rq->rd->dl_bw; + raw_spin_lock(&dl_b->lock); + __dl_sub(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, cpumask_weight(rq->rd->span)); + raw_spin_unlock(&dl_b->lock); + + dl_b = &later_rq->rd->dl_bw; + raw_spin_lock(&dl_b->lock); + __dl_add(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, cpumask_weight(later_rq->rd->span)); + raw_spin_unlock(&dl_b->lock); + set_task_cpu(p, later_rq->cpu); double_unlock_balance(later_rq, rq); -- 2.20.1
