Re: [PATCH 4.19 53/63] f2fs: fix to do sanity check on segment bitmap of LFS curseg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!


> +		for (blkofs += 1; blkofs < sbi->blocks_per_seg; blkofs++) {
> +			if (!f2fs_test_bit(blkofs, se->cur_valid_map))
> +				continue;
> +out:
> +			f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_ERR,
> +				"Current segment's next free block offset is "
> +				"inconsistent with bitmap, logtype:%u, "
> +				"segno:%u, type:%u, next_blkoff:%u, blkofs:%u",
> +				i, curseg->segno, curseg->alloc_type,
> +				curseg->next_blkoff, blkofs);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}

So this is detecting filesystem corruption, right? Should it be
-EUCLEAN?

									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux