On 12/09/2019 10:44, Sverdlin, Alexander (Nokia - DE/Ulm) wrote:
> From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> irq_domain_associate() is the only place where irq_find_mapping() can be
> used reliably (under irq_domain_mutex) to make a decision if the mapping
> shall be created or not. Other calls to irq_find_mapping() (not under
> any lock) cannot be used for this purpose and lead to race conditions in
> particular inside irq_create_mapping().
>
> Give the callers of irq_domain_associate() an ability to detect existing
> domain reliably by examining the return value.
>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> index 3078d0e..7bc07b6 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> @@ -532,6 +532,7 @@ int irq_domain_associate(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> {
> struct irq_data *irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(virq);
> + unsigned int eirq;
> int ret;
>
> if (WARN(hwirq >= domain->hwirq_max,
> @@ -543,6 +544,16 @@ int irq_domain_associate(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> mutex_lock(&irq_domain_mutex);
> +
> + /* Check if mapping already exists */
> + eirq = irq_find_mapping(domain, hwirq);
> + if (eirq) {
nit: Just have
if (irq_find_mapping(...)) {
and get rid the extra variable, given that it's not used for anything.
> + mutex_unlock(&irq_domain_mutex);
> + pr_debug("%s: conflicting mapping for hwirq 0x%x\n",
> + domain->name, (int)hwirq);
> + return -EBUSY;
I'm overall OK with this, although I'd rather we return -EEXIST rather
than -EBUSY.
> + }
> +
> irq_data->hwirq = hwirq;
> irq_data->domain = domain;
> if (domain->ops->map) {
>
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny...
