[PATCH 4.19 23/79] bus: ti-sysc: Fix using configured sysc mask value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit e212abd452a4af3174fcd469d46656f83e135a19 ]

We have cases where there are no softreset bits like with am335x lcdc.
In that case ti,sysc-mask = <0> needs to be handled properly.

Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
index e4fe954e63a9b..4ca006e2137f7 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
@@ -1022,10 +1022,7 @@ static int sysc_init_sysc_mask(struct sysc *ddata)
 	if (error)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (val)
-		ddata->cfg.sysc_val = val & ddata->cap->sysc_mask;
-	else
-		ddata->cfg.sysc_val = ddata->cap->sysc_mask;
+	ddata->cfg.sysc_val = val & ddata->cap->sysc_mask;
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.20.1






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux