On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:33:09AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:15:12AM +0200, Tyler Hicks wrote: > > On 2019-09-18 10:48:31, Christian Brauner wrote: > > > Add tw missing ptrace ifdefines to avoid compilation errors on systems > > > that do not provide PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY or > > > PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT or: > > > > > > gcc -Wl,-no-as-needed -Wall seccomp_bpf.c -lpthread -o seccomp_bpf > > > In file included from seccomp_bpf.c:52:0: > > > seccomp_bpf.c: In function ‘tracer_ptrace’: > > > seccomp_bpf.c:1792:20: error: ‘PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘PTRACE_EVENT_CLONE’? > > > EXPECT_EQ(entry ? PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY > > > ^ > > > ../kselftest_harness.h:608:13: note: in definition of macro ‘__EXPECT’ > > > __typeof__(_expected) __exp = (_expected); \ > > > ^~~~~~~~~ > > > seccomp_bpf.c:1792:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘EXPECT_EQ’ > > > EXPECT_EQ(entry ? PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY > > > ^~~~~~~~~ > > > seccomp_bpf.c:1792:20: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > > > EXPECT_EQ(entry ? PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY > > > ^ > > > ../kselftest_harness.h:608:13: note: in definition of macro ‘__EXPECT’ > > > __typeof__(_expected) __exp = (_expected); \ > > > ^~~~~~~~~ > > > seccomp_bpf.c:1792:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘EXPECT_EQ’ > > > EXPECT_EQ(entry ? PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY > > > ^~~~~~~~~ > > > seccomp_bpf.c:1793:6: error: ‘PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY’? > > > : PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT, msg); > > > ^ > > > ../kselftest_harness.h:608:13: note: in definition of macro ‘__EXPECT’ > > > __typeof__(_expected) __exp = (_expected); \ > > > ^~~~~~~~~ > > > seccomp_bpf.c:1792:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘EXPECT_EQ’ > > > EXPECT_EQ(entry ? PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY > > > ^~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > Fixes: 6a21cc50f0c7 ("seccomp: add a return code to trap to userspace") > > > > I think this Fixes line is incorrect and should be changed to: > > > > Fixes: 201766a20e30 ("ptrace: add PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO request") > > > > With that changed, > > > > Reviewed-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This is actually fixed in -next already (and, yes, with the Fixes line > Tyler has mentioned): > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/commit/?h=next&id=69b2d3c5924273a0ae968d3818210fc57a1b9d07 Excuse me, does it mean that you expect each selftest to be self-hosted? I was (and still is) under impression that selftests should be built with headers installed from the tree. Is it the case, or is it not? -- ldv