Subject: [merged] rtc-max8907-weekday-encoding-fixes.patch removed from -mm tree
To: swarren@xxxxxxxxxx,stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,mm-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 11:03:02 -0800
The patch titled
Subject: rtc: max8907: weekday encoding fixes
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
rtc-max8907-weekday-encoding-fixes.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: rtc: max8907: weekday encoding fixes
The current MAX8907 driver has two issues related to weekday value
handling:
1)
The HW WEEKDAY register has range 0..6 rather than 1..7 as documented.
Note that I validated the actual HW range by observing the HW register
roll from 6->0 rather than 6->7->1 as would otherwise be expected.
This matches Linux's tm_wday range of 0..6.
When the CMOS RAM content is lost, the date returned from the device is
2007-01-01 00:00:00, which is a Monday. The WEEKDAY register reads 1 in
this case. This matches the numbering in Linux's tm_wday field.
Hence we should write Linux's tm_wday value to the register without
modifying it. Hence, remove the +1/-1 calculations for WEEKDAY/tm_wday.
2)
There's no need to make alarms match on the WEEKDAY register, since the
other fields together uniquely define the alarm date/time. Ignoring the
WEEKDAY value in the match isolates the driver from any incorrect value in
the current time copy of the WEEKDAY register.
Each change individually, or both together, solves an issue that I
observed; "hwclock -r" would time out waiting for its alarm to fire if the
CMOS RAM content had been lost, and hence the WEEKDAY register value
mismatched what the driver expected it to be. "hwclock -w" would solve
this by over-writing the HW default WEEKDAY register value with what the
driver expected.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-max8907.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/rtc/rtc-max8907.c~rtc-max8907-weekday-encoding-fixes drivers/rtc/rtc-max8907.c
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max8907.c~rtc-max8907-weekday-encoding-fixes
+++ a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max8907.c
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static irqreturn_t max8907_irq_handler(i
{
struct max8907_rtc *rtc = data;
- regmap_update_bits(rtc->regmap, MAX8907_REG_ALARM0_CNTL, 0x7f, 0);
+ regmap_write(rtc->regmap, MAX8907_REG_ALARM0_CNTL, 0);
rtc_update_irq(rtc->rtc_dev, 1, RTC_IRQF | RTC_AF);
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static void regs_to_tm(u8 *regs, struct
bcd2bin(regs[RTC_YEAR1]) - 1900;
tm->tm_mon = bcd2bin(regs[RTC_MONTH] & 0x1f) - 1;
tm->tm_mday = bcd2bin(regs[RTC_DATE] & 0x3f);
- tm->tm_wday = (regs[RTC_WEEKDAY] & 0x07) - 1;
+ tm->tm_wday = (regs[RTC_WEEKDAY] & 0x07);
if (regs[RTC_HOUR] & HOUR_12) {
tm->tm_hour = bcd2bin(regs[RTC_HOUR] & 0x01f);
if (tm->tm_hour == 12)
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static void tm_to_regs(struct rtc_time *
regs[RTC_YEAR1] = bin2bcd(low);
regs[RTC_MONTH] = bin2bcd(tm->tm_mon + 1);
regs[RTC_DATE] = bin2bcd(tm->tm_mday);
- regs[RTC_WEEKDAY] = tm->tm_wday + 1;
+ regs[RTC_WEEKDAY] = tm->tm_wday;
regs[RTC_HOUR] = bin2bcd(tm->tm_hour);
regs[RTC_MIN] = bin2bcd(tm->tm_min);
regs[RTC_SEC] = bin2bcd(tm->tm_sec);
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static int max8907_rtc_set_alarm(struct
tm_to_regs(&alrm->time, regs);
/* Disable alarm while we update the target time */
- ret = regmap_update_bits(rtc->regmap, MAX8907_REG_ALARM0_CNTL, 0x7f, 0);
+ ret = regmap_write(rtc->regmap, MAX8907_REG_ALARM0_CNTL, 0);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
@@ -163,8 +163,7 @@ static int max8907_rtc_set_alarm(struct
return ret;
if (alrm->enabled)
- ret = regmap_update_bits(rtc->regmap, MAX8907_REG_ALARM0_CNTL,
- 0x7f, 0x7f);
+ ret = regmap_write(rtc->regmap, MAX8907_REG_ALARM0_CNTL, 0x77);
return ret;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from swarren@xxxxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
linux-next.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html