From: Andrew F. Davis <afd@xxxxxx>
commit 66f030eac257a572fbedab3d9646d87d647351fd upstream.
TI-SCI firmware will only respond to messages when the
TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED flag is set. Most messages already do
this, set this for the ones that do not.
This will be enforced in future firmware that better match the TI-SCI
specifications, this patch will not break users of existing firmware.
Fixes: aa276781a64a ("firmware: Add basic support for TI System Control Interface (TI-SCI) protocol")
Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@xxxxxx>
Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
Tested-by: Alejandro Hernandez <ajhernandez@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
@@ -471,9 +471,9 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_get_revision(struc
struct ti_sci_xfer *xfer;
int ret;
- /* No need to setup flags since it is expected to respond */
xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TI_SCI_MSG_VERSION,
- 0x0, sizeof(struct ti_sci_msg_hdr),
+ TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED,
+ sizeof(struct ti_sci_msg_hdr),
sizeof(*rev_info));
if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
@@ -601,9 +601,9 @@ static int ti_sci_get_device_state(const
info = handle_to_ti_sci_info(handle);
dev = info->dev;
- /* Response is expected, so need of any flags */
xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TI_SCI_MSG_GET_DEVICE_STATE,
- 0, sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
+ TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED,
+ sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
dev_err(dev, "Message alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
