On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 09:01:30PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Fri 2019-09-13 14:04:58, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
[ Upstream commit 72bbf9358c3676bd89dc4bd8fb0b1f2a11c288fc ]
The state related to the VP assist page is still managed by the LAPIC
code in the pv_eoi field.
I don't get it.
+bool kvm_hv_assist_page_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ if (!(vcpu->arch.hyperv.hv_vapic & HV_X64_MSR_VP_ASSIST_PAGE_ENABLE))
+ return false;
+ return vcpu->arch.pv_eoi.msr_val & KVM_MSR_ENABLED;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_hv_assist_page_enabled);
+
+bool kvm_hv_get_assist_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct hv_vp_assist_page *assist_page)
+{
+ if (!kvm_hv_assist_page_enabled(vcpu))
+ return false;
+ return !kvm_read_guest_cached(vcpu->kvm, &vcpu->arch.pv_eoi.data,
+ assist_page, sizeof(*assist_page));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_hv_get_assist_page);
+
This adds two functions, but not their users. What bug is it fixing? I
don't see any users in the next patch, either.
Look closer at the following patch.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
