On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 15:46:54 -0400
Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 06:53:28PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 12:23:38 -0400
> >Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@xxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> [ Upstream commit 882bf52fdeab47dbe991cc0e564b0b51c571d0a3 ]
> >>
> >> S5PV210's ADC variant is almost the same as v1 except that it has 10
> >> channels and doesn't require the pmu register
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@xxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Paweł Chmiel <pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >I have no particular objection to adding new IDs (which is more
> >or less what this patch is), but I didn't know autosel was
> >picking them up. So a bit of surprise... If intentional
> >then fine to apply to stable.
>
> I dragged it in because 103cda6a3b8d2 ("iio: adc: exynos-adc: Use proper
> number of channels for Exynos4x12") which is tagged for stable depended
> on this patch, and given it just adds new IDs which is part of what we
> take for stable I just took it in as is.
Ah fair enough! Thanks for the explanation.
Jonathan
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Sasha
