From: Todd Seidelmann <tseidelmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit f20faa06d83de440bec8e200870784c3458793c4 ]
The ordering of arguments to the x_tables ADD_COUNTER macro
appears to be wrong in ebtables (cf. ip_tables.c, ip6_tables.c,
and arp_tables.c).
This causes data corruption in the ebtables userspace tools
because they get incorrect packet & byte counts from the kernel.
Fixes: d72133e628803 ("netfilter: ebtables: use ADD_COUNTER macro")
Signed-off-by: Todd Seidelmann <tseidelmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
index 62ffc989a44a2..7d249afa1466c 100644
--- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
+++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ unsigned int ebt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
return NF_DROP;
}
- ADD_COUNTER(*(counter_base + i), 1, skb->len);
+ ADD_COUNTER(*(counter_base + i), skb->len, 1);
/* these should only watch: not modify, nor tell us
* what to do with the packet
@@ -963,8 +963,8 @@ static void get_counters(const struct ebt_counter *oldcounters,
continue;
counter_base = COUNTER_BASE(oldcounters, nentries, cpu);
for (i = 0; i < nentries; i++)
- ADD_COUNTER(counters[i], counter_base[i].pcnt,
- counter_base[i].bcnt);
+ ADD_COUNTER(counters[i], counter_base[i].bcnt,
+ counter_base[i].pcnt);
}
}
@@ -1289,7 +1289,7 @@ static int do_update_counters(struct net *net, const char *name,
/* we add to the counters of the first cpu */
for (i = 0; i < num_counters; i++)
- ADD_COUNTER(t->private->counters[i], tmp[i].pcnt, tmp[i].bcnt);
+ ADD_COUNTER(t->private->counters[i], tmp[i].bcnt, tmp[i].pcnt);
write_unlock_bh(&t->lock);
ret = 0;
--
2.20.1
