From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx> Tetsuo Handa had reported he saw an incorrect "downgrading a read lock" warning right after a previous lockdep warning. It is likely that the previous warning turned off lock debugging causing the lockdep to have inconsistency states leading to the lock downgrade warning. Fix that by add a check for debug_locks at the beginning of __lock_downgrade(). Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reported-by: syzbot+53383ae265fb161ef488@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1547093005-26085-1-git-send-email-longman@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index 565005a..5c370c6 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -3650,6 +3650,9 @@ static int reacquire_held_locks(struct task_struct *curr, unsigned int depth, unsigned int depth; int i; + if (unlikely(!debug_locks)) + return 0; + depth = curr->lockdep_depth; /* * This function is about (re)setting the class of a held lock, -- 1.7.9.5
