On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 07:27:22AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 09:39:53AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
From: Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit fac7b714c514fcc555541e1d6450c694b0a5f8d3 ]
This patch corrects the SPDX License Identifier style
in header files related to Drivers for Intel(R) Trace Hub
controller.
For C header files Documentation/process/license-rules.rst
mandates C-like comments (opposed to C source files where
C++ style should be used)
Changes made by using a script provided by Joe Perches here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/7/46
Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/hwtracing/intel_th/msu.h | 2 +-
drivers/hwtracing/intel_th/pti.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Not really a stable patch at all, unless you want to start backporting
all SPDX changes (hint, NO we do not!) :)
please drop this from everywhere.
And what triggered this? It's just comment changes, shouldn't the
autobot know to ignore those?
It got a score just above my cutoff, and I missed it during review :(
FWIW, there's no explicit rule to ignore documentation, AUTOSEL sort of
learned to do it on it's own, but here it seems that the content of the
commit message outweighed the code change metrics.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
