Re: [PATCH 4/5] NFSv4/pnfs: Fix a page lock leak in nfs_pageio_resend()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
fixing commit: d600ad1f2bdb NFS41: pop some layoutget errors to application.

The bot has tested the following trees: v5.2.8, v4.19.66, v4.14.138, v4.9.189, v4.4.189.

v5.2.8: Build OK!
v4.19.66: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    078b5fd92c49 ("NFS: Clean up list moves of struct nfs_page")

v4.14.138: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    078b5fd92c49 ("NFS: Clean up list moves of struct nfs_page")

v4.9.189: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    078b5fd92c49 ("NFS: Clean up list moves of struct nfs_page")

v4.4.189: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    078b5fd92c49 ("NFS: Clean up list moves of struct nfs_page")
    6272dcc6beeb ("NFS: Simplify nfs_request_add_commit_list() arguments")
    b20135d0b243 ("NFSv4.1/pNFS: Don't queue up a new commit if the layout segment is invalid")
    c18b96a1b862 ("nfs: clean up rest of reqs when failing to add one")
    f57dcf4c7211 ("NFS: Fix I/O request leakages")
    fe238e601d25 ("NFS: Save struct inode COPYING CREDITS Documentation Kbuild Kconfig MAINTAINERS Makefile README REPORTING-BUGS arch block certs crypto drivers firmware fs include init ipc kernel lib mm net samples scripts security sound tools usr virt inside nfs_commit_info to clarify usage of i_lock")


NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.

How should we proceed with this patch?

--
Thanks,
Sasha



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux