Re: Grand Schemozzle, 4.9 backport

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2019-08-09 at 10:44 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:05:28AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Here's a lightly tested backport of the Spectre v1 swapgs
> > mitigation,
> > for 4.9.
> 
> Hm, you backported 64dbc122b20f ("x86/entry/64: Use JMP instead of
> JMPQ") which is not in 4.14.y,

For 4.14, it was apparently folded into the backport of
"x86/speculation: Prepare entry code for Spectre v1 swapgs
mitigations".

> yet you did not backport 4c92057661a3
> ("Documentation: Add swapgs description to the Spectre v1
> documentation") which should go to this kernel too, right?

That touches a file that doesn't exist.  We'd first need a backport of
commit 6e88559470f5 "Documentation: Add section about CPU
vulnerabilities for Spectre".

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
If you seem to know what you are doing, you'll be given more to do.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux