From: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 987f6c69dd923069d443f6a37225f5b1630a30f2 ]
New flow table type RDMA_RX was added but the MLX5_CAP_FLOW_TABLE_TYPE
didn't handle this new flow table type.
This means that MLX5_CAP_FLOW_TABLE_TYPE returns an empty capability to
this flow table type.
Update both the macro and the maximum supported flow table type to
RDMA_RX.
Fixes: d83eb50e29de ("net/mlx5: Add support in RDMA RX steering")
Signed-off-by: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.h | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.h
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ enum fs_flow_table_type {
FS_FT_SNIFFER_RX = 0X5,
FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX = 0X6,
FS_FT_RDMA_RX = 0X7,
- FS_FT_MAX_TYPE = FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX,
+ FS_FT_MAX_TYPE = FS_FT_RDMA_RX,
};
enum fs_flow_table_op_mod {
@@ -274,7 +274,8 @@ void mlx5_cleanup_fs(struct mlx5_core_de
(type == FS_FT_FDB) ? MLX5_CAP_ESW_FLOWTABLE_FDB(mdev, cap) : \
(type == FS_FT_SNIFFER_RX) ? MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_SNIFFER_RX(mdev, cap) : \
(type == FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX) ? MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_SNIFFER_TX(mdev, cap) : \
- (BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX != FS_FT_MAX_TYPE))\
+ (type == FS_FT_RDMA_RX) ? MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_RDMA_RX(mdev, cap) : \
+ (BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(FS_FT_RDMA_RX != FS_FT_MAX_TYPE))\
)
#endif
