Re: [PATCH v8 1/9] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Use chip_good() to retry in do_write_oneword()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Thanks for the mail.

On 2019/08/06 9:43, Sasha Levin wrote:
Hi,

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag.
The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all

The bot has tested the following trees: v5.2.6, v4.19.64, v4.14.136, v4.9.187, v4.4.187.

v5.2.6: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
     4844ef80305d ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Add support for polling status register")

v4.19.64: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
     4844ef80305d ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Add support for polling status register")
     d9b8a67b3b95 ("mtd: cfi: fix deadloop in cfi_cmdset_0002.c do_write_buffer")

v4.14.136: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
     4844ef80305d ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Add support for polling status register")
     c64d4419a17c ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change erase one block to enable XIP once")
     d9b8a67b3b95 ("mtd: cfi: fix deadloop in cfi_cmdset_0002.c do_write_buffer")
     ea092fb3ce66 ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Fix coding style issues")

v4.9.187: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
     4844ef80305d ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Add support for polling status register")
     c64d4419a17c ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change erase one block to enable XIP once")
     d9b8a67b3b95 ("mtd: cfi: fix deadloop in cfi_cmdset_0002.c do_write_buffer")
     ea092fb3ce66 ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Fix coding style issues")

v4.4.187: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
     4844ef80305d ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Add support for polling status register")
     c64d4419a17c ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change erase one block to enable XIP once")
     d9b8a67b3b95 ("mtd: cfi: fix deadloop in cfi_cmdset_0002.c do_write_buffer")
     ea092fb3ce66 ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Fix coding style issues")


NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.

How should we proceed with this patch?

Yes I will do fix the patch for the trees failed to apply if it was upstream.

Regards,
Ikegami


--
Thanks,
Sasha



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux