Re: [PATCH v8 1/9] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Use chip_good() to retry in do_write_oneword()

[Tokunori Ikegami <ikegami.t@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Thanks for the mail.

On 2019/08/06 9:43, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [This is an automated email]
>
> This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag.
> The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all
>
> The bot has tested the following trees: v5.2.6, v4.19.64, v4.14.136, v4.9.187, v4.4.187.
>
> v5.2.6: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
>      4844ef80305d ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Add support for polling status register")
>
> v4.19.64: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
>      4844ef80305d ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Add support for polling status register")
>      d9b8a67b3b95 ("mtd: cfi: fix deadloop in cfi_cmdset_0002.c do_write_buffer")
>
> v4.14.136: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
>      4844ef80305d ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Add support for polling status register")
>      c64d4419a17c ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change erase one block to enable XIP once")
>      d9b8a67b3b95 ("mtd: cfi: fix deadloop in cfi_cmdset_0002.c do_write_buffer")
>      ea092fb3ce66 ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Fix coding style issues")
>
> v4.9.187: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
>      4844ef80305d ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Add support for polling status register")
>      c64d4419a17c ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change erase one block to enable XIP once")
>      d9b8a67b3b95 ("mtd: cfi: fix deadloop in cfi_cmdset_0002.c do_write_buffer")
>      ea092fb3ce66 ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Fix coding style issues")
>
> v4.4.187: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
>      4844ef80305d ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Add support for polling status register")
>      c64d4419a17c ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change erase one block to enable XIP once")
>      d9b8a67b3b95 ("mtd: cfi: fix deadloop in cfi_cmdset_0002.c do_write_buffer")
>      ea092fb3ce66 ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Fix coding style issues")
>
>
> NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
>
> How should we proceed with this patch?

Yes I will do fix the patch for the trees failed to apply if it was 
upstream.

Regards,
Ikegami

> --
> Thanks,
> Sasha