3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Nestor Lopez Casado <nlopezcasad@xxxxxxxxxxxx> commit c63e0e370028d7e4033bd40165f18499872b5183 upstream. This reverts commit 8af6c08830b1ae114d1a8b548b1f8b056e068887. This patch re-adds the workaround introduced by 596264082f10dd4 which was reverted by 8af6c08830b1ae114. The original patch 596264 was needed to overcome a situation where the hid-core would drop incoming reports while probe() was being executed. This issue was solved by c849a6143bec520af which added hid_device_io_start() and hid_device_io_stop() that enable a specific hid driver to opt-in for input reports while its probe() is being executed. Commit a9dd22b730857347 modified hid-logitech-dj so as to use the functionality added to hid-core. Having done that, workaround 596264 was no longer necessary and was reverted by 8af6c08. We now encounter a different problem that ends up 'again' thwarting the Unifying receiver enumeration. The problem is time and usb controller dependent. Ocasionally the reports sent to the usb receiver to start the paired devices enumeration fail with -EPIPE and the receiver never gets to enumerate the paired devices. With dcd9006b1b053c7b1c the problem was "hidden" as the call to the usb driver became asynchronous and none was catching the error from the failing URB. As the root cause for this failing SET_REPORT is not understood yet, -possibly a race on the usb controller drivers or a problem with the Unifying receiver- reintroducing this workaround solves the problem. Overall what this workaround does is: If an input report from an unknown device is received, then a (re)enumeration is performed. related bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1194649 Signed-off-by: Nestor Lopez Casado <nlopezcasad@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.h | 1 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+) --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ static struct hid_ll_driver logi_dj_ll_d static int logi_dj_output_hidraw_report(struct hid_device *hid, u8 * buf, size_t count, unsigned char report_type); +static int logi_dj_recv_query_paired_devices(struct dj_receiver_dev *djrcv_dev); static void logi_dj_recv_destroy_djhid_device(struct dj_receiver_dev *djrcv_dev, struct dj_report *dj_report) @@ -232,6 +233,7 @@ static void logi_dj_recv_add_djhid_devic if (dj_report->report_params[DEVICE_PAIRED_PARAM_SPFUNCTION] & SPFUNCTION_DEVICE_LIST_EMPTY) { dbg_hid("%s: device list is empty\n", __func__); + djrcv_dev->querying_devices = false; return; } @@ -242,6 +244,12 @@ static void logi_dj_recv_add_djhid_devic return; } + if (djrcv_dev->paired_dj_devices[dj_report->device_index]) { + /* The device is already known. No need to reallocate it. */ + dbg_hid("%s: device is already known\n", __func__); + return; + } + dj_hiddev = hid_allocate_device(); if (IS_ERR(dj_hiddev)) { dev_err(&djrcv_hdev->dev, "%s: hid_allocate_device failed\n", @@ -305,6 +313,7 @@ static void delayedwork_callback(struct struct dj_report dj_report; unsigned long flags; int count; + int retval; dbg_hid("%s\n", __func__); @@ -337,6 +346,25 @@ static void delayedwork_callback(struct logi_dj_recv_destroy_djhid_device(djrcv_dev, &dj_report); break; default: + /* A normal report (i. e. not belonging to a pair/unpair notification) + * arriving here, means that the report arrived but we did not have a + * paired dj_device associated to the report's device_index, this + * means that the original "device paired" notification corresponding + * to this dj_device never arrived to this driver. The reason is that + * hid-core discards all packets coming from a device while probe() is + * executing. */ + if (!djrcv_dev->paired_dj_devices[dj_report.device_index]) { + /* ok, we don't know the device, just re-ask the + * receiver for the list of connected devices. */ + retval = logi_dj_recv_query_paired_devices(djrcv_dev); + if (!retval) { + /* everything went fine, so just leave */ + break; + } + dev_err(&djrcv_dev->hdev->dev, + "%s:logi_dj_recv_query_paired_devices " + "error:%d\n", __func__, retval); + } dbg_hid("%s: unexpected report type\n", __func__); } } @@ -367,6 +395,12 @@ static void logi_dj_recv_forward_null_re if (!djdev) { dbg_hid("djrcv_dev->paired_dj_devices[dj_report->device_index]" " is NULL, index %d\n", dj_report->device_index); + kfifo_in(&djrcv_dev->notif_fifo, dj_report, sizeof(struct dj_report)); + + if (schedule_work(&djrcv_dev->work) == 0) { + dbg_hid("%s: did not schedule the work item, was already " + "queued\n", __func__); + } return; } @@ -397,6 +431,12 @@ static void logi_dj_recv_forward_report( if (dj_device == NULL) { dbg_hid("djrcv_dev->paired_dj_devices[dj_report->device_index]" " is NULL, index %d\n", dj_report->device_index); + kfifo_in(&djrcv_dev->notif_fifo, dj_report, sizeof(struct dj_report)); + + if (schedule_work(&djrcv_dev->work) == 0) { + dbg_hid("%s: did not schedule the work item, was already " + "queued\n", __func__); + } return; } @@ -444,6 +484,10 @@ static int logi_dj_recv_query_paired_dev struct dj_report *dj_report; int retval; + /* no need to protect djrcv_dev->querying_devices */ + if (djrcv_dev->querying_devices) + return 0; + dj_report = kzalloc(sizeof(struct dj_report), GFP_KERNEL); if (!dj_report) return -ENOMEM; @@ -455,6 +499,7 @@ static int logi_dj_recv_query_paired_dev return retval; } + static int logi_dj_recv_switch_to_dj_mode(struct dj_receiver_dev *djrcv_dev, unsigned timeout) { --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.h +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.h @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ struct dj_receiver_dev { struct work_struct work; struct kfifo notif_fifo; spinlock_t lock; + bool querying_devices; }; struct dj_device { -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html