On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 1:55 PM Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think I got it working now, all looks good for 4.9.y, 4.14.y and > 4.19.y for gcc9 so far. I'll leave 4.4.y alone :) You are welcome! I am glad we can now use gcc 9 easily. I will be keeping a look into gcc 10. :) Cheers, Miguel
