On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 01:49:54PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> Commit daaef255dc96 ("driver: platform: Support parsing GpioInt 0 in
> platform_get_irq()") broke the Embedded Controller driver on most LPC
> Chromebooks (i.e., most x86 Chromebooks), because cros_ec_lpc expects
> platform_get_irq() to return -ENXIO for non-existent IRQs.
> Unfortunately, acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get() doesn't follow this convention
> and returns -ENOENT instead. So we get this error from cros_ec_lpc:
>
> couldn't retrieve IRQ number (-2)
>
> I see a variety of drivers that treat -ENXIO specially, so rather than
> fix all of them, let's fix up the API to restore its previous behavior.
>
> I reported this on v2 of this patch:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190220180538.GA42642@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> but apparently the patch had already been merged before v3 got sent out:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190221193429.161300-1-egranata@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> and the result is that the bug landed and remains unfixed.
>
> I differ from the v3 patch by:
> * allowing for ret==0, even though acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get() specifically
> documents (and enforces) that 0 is not a valid return value (noted on
> the v3 review)
> * adding a small comment
Thank you for fixing this.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Reported-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Salvatore Bellizzi <salvatore.bellizzi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Enrico Granata <egranata@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: daaef255dc96 ("driver: platform: Support parsing GpioInt 0 in platform_get_irq()")
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Side note: it might have helped alleviate some of this pain if there
> were email notifications to the mailing list when a patch gets applied.
> I didn't realize (and I'm not sure if Enrico did) that v2 was already
> merged by the time I noted its mistakes. If I had known, I would have
> suggested a follow-up patch, not a v3.
>
> I know some maintainers' "tip bots" do this, but not all apparently.
>
> drivers/base/platform.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> index 506a0175a5a7..ec974ba9c0c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> @@ -157,8 +157,13 @@ int platform_get_irq(struct platform_device *dev, unsigned int num)
> * the device will only expose one IRQ, and this fallback
> * allows a common code path across either kind of resource.
> */
> - if (num == 0 && has_acpi_companion(&dev->dev))
> - return acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(ACPI_COMPANION(&dev->dev), num);
> + if (num == 0 && has_acpi_companion(&dev->dev)) {
> + int ret = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(ACPI_COMPANION(&dev->dev), num);
> +
> + /* Our callers expect -ENXIO for missing IRQs. */
> + if (ret >= 0 || ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> return -ENXIO;
> #endif
> --
> 2.22.0.709.g102302147b-goog
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
