On 01/13/2014 05:32 AM, Luis Henriques wrote: > On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 09:03:39PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> 26bef1318adc1b3a530ecc807ef99346db2aa8b0 should have been tagged for >> stable, but it wasn't. The bug in question dates back to ancient times; >> I expect it should apply without problems to any still supported tree. >> > > Thank you, I'm queuing it for the 3.5 and 3.11 kernels. > Incidentally, is there any reasons your patchsets/trees are: a) not hosted on kernel.org, b) uses a 3.x.y.z convention instead of 3.x.y? It seems like completely needless fragmentation, especially since as far as I can tell, you are always putting things at the end of the "upstream" stable series (i.e. you don't end up with both 3.5.9.1 and 3.5.10). -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html