From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 9b3d15e6b05e0b916be5fbd915f90300a403098b ]
Unlike legacy chips, 57500 chips don't need additional VNIC resources
for aRFS/ntuple. Fix the code accordingly so that we don't reserve
and allocate additional VNICs on 57500 chips. Without this patch,
the driver is failing to initialize when it tries to allocate extra
VNICs.
Fixes: ac33906c67e2 ("bnxt_en: Add support for aRFS on 57500 chips.")
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -3022,7 +3022,7 @@ static int bnxt_alloc_vnics(struct bnxt
int num_vnics = 1;
#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
- if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_RFS)
+ if ((bp->flags & (BNXT_FLAG_RFS | BNXT_FLAG_CHIP_P5)) == BNXT_FLAG_RFS)
num_vnics += bp->rx_nr_rings;
#endif
@@ -7133,6 +7133,9 @@ static int bnxt_alloc_rfs_vnics(struct b
#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
int i, rc = 0;
+ if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_CHIP_P5)
+ return 0;
+
for (i = 0; i < bp->rx_nr_rings; i++) {
struct bnxt_vnic_info *vnic;
u16 vnic_id = i + 1;
@@ -9592,7 +9595,7 @@ int bnxt_check_rings(struct bnxt *bp, in
return -ENOMEM;
vnics = 1;
- if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_RFS)
+ if ((bp->flags & (BNXT_FLAG_RFS | BNXT_FLAG_CHIP_P5)) == BNXT_FLAG_RFS)
vnics += rx_rings;
if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_AGG_RINGS)
