3.11.10.3 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@xxxxxxxxx> commit d0abafac8c9162f39c4f6b2f8141b772a09b3770 upstream. Commit f5a44db5d2 introduced a regression on filesystems created with the bigalloc feature (cluster size > blocksize). It causes xfstests generic/006 and /013 to fail with an unexpected JBD2 failure and transaction abort that leaves the test file system in a read only state. Other xfstests run on bigalloc file systems are likely to fail as well. The cause is the accidental use of a cluster mask where a cluster offset was needed in ext4_ext_map_blocks(). Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/ext4/extents.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c index f8d6668..878338f 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c @@ -4145,7 +4145,7 @@ int ext4_ext_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, */ map->m_flags &= ~EXT4_MAP_FROM_CLUSTER; newex.ee_block = cpu_to_le32(map->m_lblk); - cluster_offset = EXT4_LBLK_CMASK(sbi, map->m_lblk); + cluster_offset = EXT4_LBLK_COFF(sbi, map->m_lblk); /* * If we are doing bigalloc, check to see if the extent returned -- 1.8.3.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html