The patch titled Subject: include/asm-generic/bug.h: fix "cut here" for WARN_ON for __WARN_TAINT architectures has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was bug-fix-cut-here-for-warn_on-for-__warn_taint-architectures.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: Drew Davenport <ddavenport@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: include/asm-generic/bug.h: fix "cut here" for WARN_ON for __WARN_TAINT architectures For architectures using __WARN_TAINT, the WARN_ON macro did not print out the "cut here" string. The other WARN_XXX macros would print "cut here" inside __warn_printk, which is not called for WARN_ON since it doesn't have a message to print. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190624154831.163888-1-ddavenport@xxxxxxxxxxxx Fixes: a7bed27af194 ("bug: fix "cut here" location for __WARN_TAINT architectures") Signed-off-by: Drew Davenport <ddavenport@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- include/asm-generic/bug.h | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/include/asm-generic/bug.h~bug-fix-cut-here-for-warn_on-for-__warn_taint-architectures +++ a/include/asm-generic/bug.h @@ -104,8 +104,10 @@ extern void warn_slowpath_null(const cha warn_slowpath_fmt_taint(__FILE__, __LINE__, taint, arg) #else extern __printf(1, 2) void __warn_printk(const char *fmt, ...); -#define __WARN() __WARN_TAINT(TAINT_WARN) -#define __WARN_printf(arg...) do { __warn_printk(arg); __WARN(); } while (0) +#define __WARN() do { \ + printk(KERN_WARNING CUT_HERE); __WARN_TAINT(TAINT_WARN); \ +} while (0) +#define __WARN_printf(arg...) __WARN_printf_taint(TAINT_WARN, arg) #define __WARN_printf_taint(taint, arg...) \ do { __warn_printk(arg); __WARN_TAINT(taint); } while (0) #endif _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from ddavenport@xxxxxxxxxxxx are