From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 3285170f28a850638794cdfe712eb6d93e51e706 ]
Commit 372e722ea4dd4ca1 ("gpiolib: use descriptors internally") renamed
the functions to use a "gpiod" prefix, and commit 79a9becda8940deb
("gpiolib: export descriptor-based GPIO interface") introduced the "raw"
variants, but both changes forgot to update the comments.
Readd a similar reference to gpiod_set_value(), which was accidentally
removed by commit 1e77fc82110ac36f ("gpio: Add missing open drain/source
handling to gpiod_set_value_cansleep()").
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190701142738.25219-1-geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 21062cb6b85f..3db0a9b0d259 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -2480,7 +2480,7 @@ static int _gpiod_get_raw_value(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
int gpiod_get_raw_value(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
{
VALIDATE_DESC(desc);
- /* Should be using gpio_get_value_cansleep() */
+ /* Should be using gpiod_get_raw_value_cansleep() */
WARN_ON(desc->gdev->chip->can_sleep);
return _gpiod_get_raw_value(desc);
}
@@ -2501,7 +2501,7 @@ int gpiod_get_value(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
int value;
VALIDATE_DESC(desc);
- /* Should be using gpio_get_value_cansleep() */
+ /* Should be using gpiod_get_value_cansleep() */
WARN_ON(desc->gdev->chip->can_sleep);
value = _gpiod_get_raw_value(desc);
@@ -2670,7 +2670,7 @@ void gpiod_set_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
void gpiod_set_raw_value(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value)
{
VALIDATE_DESC_VOID(desc);
- /* Should be using gpiod_set_value_cansleep() */
+ /* Should be using gpiod_set_raw_value_cansleep() */
WARN_ON(desc->gdev->chip->can_sleep);
_gpiod_set_raw_value(desc, value);
}
--
2.20.1
