Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: migrate: Fix races of __find_get_block() and page migration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 05:04:55PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 14:58:38 +0200 Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > buffer_migrate_page_norefs() can race with bh users in a following way:
> > 
> > CPU1					CPU2
> > buffer_migrate_page_norefs()
> >   buffer_migrate_lock_buffers()
> >   checks bh refs
> >   spin_unlock(&mapping->private_lock)
> > 					__find_get_block()
> > 					  spin_lock(&mapping->private_lock)
> > 					  grab bh ref
> > 					  spin_unlock(&mapping->private_lock)
> >   move page				  do bh work
> > 
> > This can result in various issues like lost updates to buffers (i.e.
> > metadata corruption) or use after free issues for the old page.
> > 
> > Closing this race window is relatively difficult. We could hold
> > mapping->private_lock in buffer_migrate_page_norefs() until we are
> > finished with migrating the page but the lock hold times would be rather
> > big. So let's revert to a more careful variant of page migration requiring
> > eviction of buffers on migrated page. This is effectively
> > fallback_migrate_page() that additionally invalidates bh LRUs in case
> > try_to_free_buffers() failed.
> 
> Is this premature optimization?  Holding ->private_lock while messing
> with the buffers would be the standard way of addressing this.  The
> longer hold times *might* be an issue, but we don't know this, do we? 
> If there are indeed such problems then they could be improved by, say,
> doing more of the newpage preparation prior to taking ->private_lock.
> 

To some extent, we do not know how much of a problem this patch will
be either or what impact avoiding dirty block pages during migration
is either. So both approaches have their downsides.

However, failing a high-order allocation is typically benign and it is an
inevitable problem that depends on the workload. I don't think we could
ever hit a case whereby there was enough spinning to cause a soft lockup
but on the other hand, I don't think there is much scope for doing more
of the preparation steps before acquiring private_lock either.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux