On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:49:10AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:17 AM Jarkko Sakkinen > <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 09:30:25AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 4:35 AM <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. > > > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > > > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > > > > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > > > ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ > > > > > > > > From db4d8cb9c9f2af71c4d087817160d866ed572cc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > > From: Vadim Sukhomlinov <sukhomlinov@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:01:18 -0700 > > > > Subject: [PATCH] tpm: Fix TPM 1.2 Shutdown sequence to prevent future TPM > > > > operations > > > > > > Posted at: > > > > > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190711162919.23813-1-dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Thank you! I usually end up taking care of these myself :-) A rare > > occasion. Does this also address 4.4, 4.9 and 4.14 or do they still > > need backports of their own? > > In Chrome OS we have the same solution for 4.14. > > This patch will _definitely_ not apply cleanly for 4.4. Not sure what > the best course of action is there, but in the "after the cut" notes > in my post I talk about it a little bit. > > On 4.9 things look similar-ish, but I don't know quite enough to know > if it will work well there. > > (all of this in the context that apparently some extra locking patches > even for 4.14 and 4.19--see the thread in response to my posted > patch). OK, I'll look at those when I come back from leave after two weeks. /Jarkko
